Skip to content
The Comp GuysAttorneys at Robert Wilson & Associates
Got a work comp question?Call or text (612) 568-5291. You will speak to a live person right away, not a bot or a voicemail tree. No pressure.

Can You Be Fired While on Workers' Comp in Minnesota?

Minnesota is an at-will employment state, but firing someone for filing a workers' comp claim is illegal retaliation. Here's what the law actually says and what you can do about it.

Updated 2026-02-27Reviewed 2026-02-27Reviewer: Dan Swenson

The short answer: Yes, you can be fired while on workers' comp in Minnesota - but not because you filed a claim. That distinction matters enormously.

Minnesota is an at-will employment state, which means an employer can generally terminate an employee for any reason or no reason. But there is a major exception: Minn. Stat. § 176.82 makes it illegal to fire, threaten, or discriminate against an employee because the employee filed a workers' comp claim or exercised rights under the Workers' Compensation Act.

If you're dealing with this situation right now, consider talking to a workers' comp attorney about your specific situation.

At-Will Employment vs. Retaliation

Understanding the tension between these two principles is key:

At-will employment means your employer does not need "good cause" to fire you. They can lay you off, restructure your position, or terminate you for poor performance - even while you're on workers' comp.

Anti-retaliation law means they cannot do it because of your workers' comp claim. The critical question is always: What was the real reason?

Courts look at the totality of the circumstances. If you filed a claim on Monday and were fired on Tuesday with no prior performance issues, a judge is going to scrutinize that timing very carefully.

What the Statute Actually Says

Minn. Stat. § 176.82, subd. 1 provides:

Any person who discharges or threatens to discharge, or who intentionally obstructs or intentionally hinders, an employee who seeks workers' compensation benefits or who has exercised any right under Chapter 176 is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be sentenced accordingly.

The statute also creates a civil cause of action. Under subdivision 2, an employee who has been discharged or discriminated against in violation of the statute may bring a civil action for:

  • Reinstatement to the same or equivalent position.
  • Back pay - the wages lost between discharge and reinstatement.
  • Restoration of benefits.
  • Reasonable attorney fees.

This is a powerful remedy. It goes beyond the workers' comp system itself - it is a separate legal claim with its own damages.

What Counts as Retaliation?

Retaliation is not limited to outright firing. Under the statute and case law, retaliation includes:

  • Termination after filing a claim or returning from a work injury.
  • Refusal to rehire a former employee because of a prior claim.
  • Demotion or reduction in hours tied to the claim.
  • Threats - "If you file a claim, you won't have a job to come back to."
  • Hostile treatment intended to pressure an employee into dropping a claim or not filing one.
  • Constructive discharge - making conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person would quit.

The key element is causation: the adverse action was motivated by the employee's exercise of workers' comp rights.

How Retaliation Cases Are Proven

Because employers rarely say "we're firing you for filing a workers' comp claim," retaliation is usually proven through circumstantial evidence. Common factors courts consider:

  • Timing. How close was the termination to the claim filing, the injury report, or the return-to-work date?
  • Pretext. Did the employer give a reason for the firing that doesn't hold up? For example, citing "poor performance" when the employee had good reviews before the injury.
  • Disparate treatment. Were other employees with similar issues treated differently?
  • Statements. Did a supervisor make comments about the claim, the injury, or the employee's restrictions?
  • Pattern. Has the employer terminated other employees after they filed claims?

No single factor is dispositive, but a combination of timing, pretext, and disparate treatment can build a strong case.

The FMLA and ADA Overlap

Workers' comp, FMLA, and ADA are separate legal frameworks, but they frequently overlap for injured workers. Understanding the interaction matters:

FMLA (Family and Medical Leave Act)

If you qualify for FMLA (you've worked for the employer for at least 12 months, worked at least 1,250 hours, and the employer has 50+ employees within 75 miles), your employer must hold your job - or an equivalent position - for up to 12 weeks of leave in a 12-month period.

  • FMLA leave can run concurrently with workers' comp leave. Your employer can (and usually does) designate your workers' comp absence as FMLA leave. This is normal.
  • Once FMLA leave is exhausted, the employer's obligation to hold the position changes. But retaliation law under § 176.82 still applies.

ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act)

If your work injury results in a disability as defined by the ADA, your employer may be required to provide reasonable accommodation - which could include modified duties, schedule changes, or reassignment to an open position.

  • The ADA obligation continues beyond FMLA leave and is independent of the workers' comp system.
  • An employer cannot refuse accommodation simply because the disability arose from a workers' comp injury.

How They Work Together

Here's a typical scenario:

  1. You're injured at work. Workers' comp claim is filed. § 176.82 applies - no retaliation.
  2. You take time off. Employer designates it as FMLA leave. FMLA applies - job protected for 12 weeks.
  3. FMLA leave expires. You're still unable to return. Employer must still consider ADA reasonable accommodation before terminating.
  4. Throughout all of this, § 176.82 remains in effect - the employer cannot terminate you because of the workers' comp claim.

The protections layer on top of each other, and the analysis depends on the specific facts of each case.

Return-to-Work Obligations

Under Minn. Stat. § 176.101, there are return-to-work obligations on both sides:

  • The employer has an obligation to offer suitable work within your restrictions if it's available.
  • The employee has an obligation to accept suitable work within restrictions.

If your employer terminates your position while you're on workers' comp and later claims you "refused to return to work," the facts around what was actually offered and whether it was within your restrictions become critical.

What to Do If You Think You Were Fired in Retaliation

  1. Document everything. Save emails, text messages, performance reviews, and any written communications about the termination.
  2. Note the timeline. Write down exactly when you reported the injury, when you filed the claim, and when you were terminated.
  3. Get the stated reason in writing. If the employer gave a reason verbally, follow up in writing: "I want to confirm - you said I was terminated because of [reason]. Is that correct?"
  4. Do not sign a severance agreement without having it reviewed by an attorney. Severance agreements often include a release of all claims, including retaliation claims.
  5. Contact an attorney immediately. Retaliation claims have their own procedural requirements and timing matters.
  6. File for unemployment. A workers' comp retaliation claim and an unemployment claim are separate. Apply for unemployment benefits promptly.

What You Should NOT Do

  • Don't assume you have no claim just because Minnesota is at-will. At-will is not a blanket license to retaliate.
  • Don't wait. Evidence gets stale. Witnesses forget. Document early.
  • Don't post about it on social media. Anything you post can be used against you in proceedings.
  • Don't retaliate back. Don't take company property, send angry emails to the CEO, or do anything that gives the employer a legitimate after-the-fact reason for termination.

Statutes Referenced

Frequently Asked Questions

Can my employer fire me while I'm on workers' comp in Minnesota?

Technically, yes - Minnesota is an at-will employment state, so an employer can terminate you for legitimate business reasons even while you're on workers' comp. However, if the real reason is that you filed a claim or exercised any right under the Workers' Compensation Act, that is illegal retaliation under Minn. Stat. § 176.82. The question is always why you were fired, not when.

What counts as workers' comp retaliation in Minnesota?

Retaliation includes discharge, threats, refusal to rehire, demotion, hostile treatment, or any other adverse action motivated by the employee's exercise of workers' comp rights. Courts look at timing, pretext, disparate treatment, and other circumstantial evidence to determine whether the employer's stated reason is the real reason.

What can I recover if I was fired in retaliation for filing a workers' comp claim?

Under Minn. Stat. § 176.82, subd. 2, you may recover reinstatement, back pay, restoration of benefits, and reasonable attorney fees. The statute also makes retaliatory discharge a misdemeanor, though criminal prosecution is rare.

Does FMLA protect my job while I'm on workers' comp?

If you qualify for FMLA, your employer must hold your job (or an equivalent one) for up to 12 weeks of leave. FMLA leave can run concurrently with workers' comp leave - meaning the employer can count your workers' comp absence against your FMLA entitlement. After FMLA is exhausted, ADA reasonable accommodation and workers' comp retaliation law under § 176.82 continue to provide protection, though the analysis becomes more fact-specific.

Related guides

Call NowText